The laddu controversy has become a serious political battle in Andhra Pradesh. The ruling coalition has placed its allegations on record in the Assembly. It has linked the alleged adulteration issue to the previous government led by Y. S. Jagan Mohan Reddy.

The Assembly debate was not just another discussion. It was an official forum where the government presented its case. Chief Minister N. Chandrababu Naidu and coalition leaders used the platform to reinforce their narrative. Their version now forms part of legislative record.

jagan had already addressed the media and rejected the allegations. He presented documents and defended his administration. That helped his party cadre. But a press meet is not equal to a floor debate. The Assembly carries authority and visibility. It is where leaders confront charges directly.

Jagan’s absence allowed the ruling side to speak without facing him in the House. Even if he was not guaranteed speaking time, his presence would have signaled confidence. It would have shown that he was ready to defend his record in the strongest forum available.

Politics is about timing and optics. When an issue reaches the Assembly stage, presence matters. In this case, Jagan missed an opportunity to challenge the narrative head on.

The controversy will continue. But this debate was a key moment. And he was not there.