Home Tags AP High Court

AP High Court sets GO 1 aside

0

The Andhra Pradesh high court on Friday gave a big shock to the state government headed by Jagan Mohan Reddy.

The high court set the GO 1 aside stating that it was against the fundamental rights guaranteed by the Constitution. The court observed that the state government has no right to go against the fundamental rights of the people.

It may be recalled here that the state government had issued the GO 1 on January 2 this year prohibiting rallies and public meetings on the narrow roads. The GO was followed by two stampedes at Kandukur in Nellore district and Guntur city in which 11 people died.

CPI state secretary K Ramakrishna filed a public interest litigation against the bill in the high court. Former minister and TDP leader Kollu Ravindra, AP Congress president Gidugu Rudraraju, former minister Kanna Lakshminarayana, AISF general secretary Siva Reddy, AIYF president Rajendra Babu also filed separate petitions in the court challenging the GO 1.

The court headed by chief justice Prashanth Kumar Mishra heard the case on January 24 and reserved the judgment.

Meanwhile, TDP president N Chandrababu Naidu welcomed the high court judgment on the GO 1. He said that the makers of the Constitution have thought of people like Jagan who might deny the fundamental rights of the people.

The constitution makers have given protection to the fundamental rights, he said and advised Jagan Mohan Reddy to understand the spirit of the constitution.

Telugu360 is always open for the best and bright journalists. If you are interested in full-time or freelance, email us at Krishna@telugu360.com.

AP high court defers jail for IAS, IPS officers

0

The AP high court on Tuesday deferred jail term for a senior IAS officer and senior IPS officer in Andhra Pradesh. The court posted the case for June 16 for next hearing.

The high court single judge bench had awarded jail term for IAS officer Krishna Babu and IPS officer Dwaraka Tirumala Rao in contempt case. It was alleged that Krishna Babu, who was the secretary for the transport department and Dwaraka Tirumala Rao, who was the managing director of the APSRTC are accused of contempt.

The filed men staff of the APSRTC have filed a suit in the high court some time ago seeking regularisation of their services. The court had ordered in their favor and directed the officials to regularise the employees.

However, it is alleged that Krishna Babu as secretary of the transport department and Dwaraka Tirumala Rao as managing director of the APSRTC have not implemented the orders of the court, attracting the contempt case.

As the two officers ignored the court direction, the employees again approached the high court. A single member bench of the high court ordered jail term for the two officers.

The two officers then approached the division bench of the high court which on Tuesday issued stay on the single judge bench orders. The division bench would take up the case for the next hearing on June 16.

Telugu360 is always open for the best and bright journalists. If you are interested in full-time or freelance, email us at Krishna@telugu360.com.

Andhra HC refuses to stay allotment of house sites in Amaravati

0

The Andhra Pradesh High Court on Friday refused to pass interim orders on a petition filed by farmers of Amaravati challenging the state government’s move to allot house sites in the capital region to non-locals.

The High Court declined to stay the process of allotment but said the allotment of house sites will be subject to final judgment in the case.

The state government declared a new zone R-5-in Amaravati in March to provide houses for poor people over 900 acres of land.

The move has angered the farmers who are already protesting the decision of the state government to develop three state capitals.

Amaravati farmers’ Joint Action Committee (JAC) said the decision was taken without consulting the farmers. They challenged it in the High Court on the ground that this would change the status of the capital region and affect their interests.

A division bench comprising Chief Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra and Justice Ravi Nath Tilhari, however, refused to give any interim directions on the petition.

The farmers challenged the allotment house sites in violation of the master plan. They argued that locals should be allotted the sites after development of the region.

The government defended its action. It argued that farmers can demand lands assured to them by the government but it has the right to allot land to anybody. The court was told that the government has taken a decision to allot land to the poor.

It was in October last year that the government had amended the Amaravati master plan in order to provide houses to poor people over 900 acres of land spread across four villages.

The farmers had challenged the amendment in the court and, on the direction of the court, authorities had organised a meeting in the villages. Farmers had totally opposed the order.

However, ignoring the objection of farmers, the government went ahead by issuing a gazette in March.

Earlier efforts by the government to allot lands proved futile as pro-Amaravati farmers had filed a petition and the High Court cancelled the order. Following this, the YSRC government amended the APCRDA Act to provide house sites.

The new zone-R-5-in the capital region will be within the boundaries of Krishnayapalem, Nidamarru, Kuragallu in Mangalagiri mandal, Manddam and Ainavolu villages in Thullur mandal.

Telugu360 is always open for the best and bright journalists. If you are interested in full-time or freelance, email us at Krishna@telugu360.com.

AP high court CJ reserves judgment on GO 1

0

AP high court chief justice Prashant Kumar Mishra reserved judgment on the petitions challenging the GO 1 issued by the state government regulating the public meetings and rallies on the roads.

The chief justice heard the petitions for the second consecutive day on Tuesday and reserved the judgment.

The petitioners challenged the GO stating that it was politically motivated to stop the opposition parties from holding rallies and public meetings. They wanted the high court to scrap the GO and allow the parties to hold rallies.

However, the chief justice said that the GO was brought only after two stampedes in which 11 people were killed. He also cited an earlier judgment of the Supreme Court, which said that the governments have the right to regulate meetings and rallies on the road in the larger interests and safety of the people.

Earlier, on the previous day, the chief justice took strong exception to the vacation court hearing the case though there was no urgency in it. The chief justice felt that the vacation court judge had acted as de facto chief justice and asserted that he is aware of the facts related to the GO and the connected issues.

While the vacation court had imposed a stay on the implementation of the GO, the state government approached the Supreme Court through a special leave petition. However, the apex court refused to intervene and directed the AP chief justice to hear the petition and resolve it.

Under these circumstances, the chief justice completed the hearing on the batch of petitions filed by the opposition parties. It is to be seen what the chief justice would decide when he delivers the judgment.

Telugu360 is always open for the best and bright journalists. If you are interested in full-time or freelance, email us at Krishna@telugu360.com.

AP high court sets GO 1 aside till Jan 23

1

The Andhra Pradesh high court on Thursday put GO MS No 1 aside and posted the case for the next hearing on January 20. The high court also issued notices to the State government to file a counter by then.

The high court bench headed by Justice Bhattu Devanand, took up the hearing of a petition filed by CPI secretary K Ramakrishna.

Advocate General S Sriram told the court that the government has no information about the petition. He also questioned how the petition came up for hearing to the vacation bench. He also expressed surprise over the petition taken up in the roster system.

Ramakrishna alleged that GO 1 was brought to silence the opposition parties. He said that no government had taken this sort of decision in the last 75 years of independence. He also claimed that the GO was against the rights of the opposition to hold protests and public meetings.

As the court set aside the GO, Ramakrishna told the media persons that the court had taken the right decision to protect the rights of the opposition. He alleged that the ruling YSR Congress leaders have taken up rallies and held meetings even after the GO was issued.

However, he said that the government and the police were only targeting the opposition parties against holding rallies and political meetings.

The CPI secretary asked the state government to withdraw the GO before the court suspended it permanently.

Telugu360 is always open for the best and bright journalists. If you are interested in full-time or freelance, email us at Krishna@telugu360.com.

AP high court constitutes Central officials to check Rushikonda

0

The Andhra Pradesh high court on Thursday directed the state government to constitute a committee with the Central government officials for the inspection of the works on Rushikonda in Visakhapatnam.

The court had dismissed the five-member committee constituted by the state government which included three officials representing the State government.

The high court questioned the state government for having its own officials in the committee that was expected to inspect the excavation on Rushikonda.

The court asked the State government to give the names of the five officials of the Central government and ask them to submit their findings to the high court by January 31, 2023.

TDP MLA from Visakhapatnam Velagapudi Ramakrishna and Jana Sena leader Murthy Yadav have filed a case in the high court requesting the court to stop the excavation work on Rushikonda.

The court had earlier after the initial hearing directed the state government to constitute an expert committee to inspect the excavation works on the hill.

However, when the state government constituted a five-member committee with two officials from the Central government and three from the state government.

The petitioners have again challenged the committee in the high court and filed petitions. Accordingly, after hearing on Thursday, the court directed the State government to constitute the five-member committee with the Central government officials.

Telugu360 is always open for the best and bright journalists. If you are interested in full-time or freelance, email us at Krishna@telugu360.com.

AP high court imposes jail term to TTD EO

0

The Andhra Pradesh high court on Tuesday imposed jail term for TTD executive officer A V Dharma Reddy. The court took serious note of the executive officer not implementing the court’s earlier orders.

The court imposed one month jail and a penal amount of Rs 2000. The court, after hearing the contempt case filed by three employees, issued the orders on Tuesday.

The court had earlier directed the executive officer to regularise the services of three employees working in the TTD.

The employees filed a contempt petition in the court stating that the executive officer did not implement the court order and regularised their services.

The court wondered why the orders were not implemented and took serious note of the indifferent attitude of the executive officer.

Telugu360 is always open for the best and bright journalists. If you are interested in full-time or freelance, email us at Krishna@telugu360.com.

At last Nellore Court theft case goes to CBI

0

Finally, the AP high court on Thursday handed over the theft case from Nellore court to the CBI. The high court bench headed by chief justice P K Mishra had announced handing over of the case to the CBI.

The case is related to an alleged theft in the Nellore local court on April 14 this year. Some miscreants gained entry into the court room and decamped with some important documents including a case against Minister for Agriculture Kakani Govardhan Reddy.

The police said that it was the work of some habitual criminals from the area who entered the court due to a mistaken identity. Later, the police also said that the criminals entered the court to escape from the street dogs.

What was interesting was that the documents related to a case against Kakani Govardhan Reddy were stolen by the miscreants. However, some of them were recovered by the police in an irrigation canal the next day.

The case was filed in December 2017 by TDP leader and former minister Somireddy Chandramohan Reddy against Govardhan Reddy. The TDP leader filed a defamation suit against Govardhan Reddy alleging that the latter had forged some documents to substantiate his charges against the TDP leader.

The case is now heard in the fourth additional judicial magistrate court in Nellore and the theft also happened here after Govardhan Reddy became the minister.

The high court took up the case and directed the district principal judge to submit a report. Based on the report of the judge, the high court had earlier issued notices to Minister Govardhan Reddy, the CBI director and the state government seeking their views if the case is handed over to the CBI.

The state government and the Minister too have given their consent to the high court following which the high court transferred the case to the CBI.

Meanwhile, Govardhan Reddy welcomed the high court decision and said that he would be free from the allegations of sponsoring the theft.

Telugu360 is always open for the best and bright journalists. If you are interested in full-time or freelance, email us at Krishna@telugu360.com.

AP high court fines Ippatam villagers

0

The Andhra Pradesh high court on Thursday imposed a penalty of Rs 1 lakh each on the residents of Ippatam village of Tadepalli mandal in Guntur district. The court found fault with the residents for misleading the court on road widening works in the village by the Mangalagiri-Tadepalli Municipal Corporation, early this month.

The residents approached the high court against the demolitions and secured a stay order. The court found that all the 14 residents had misled the court and misused the court’s process to get the stay order.

The court also found that the officials have issued notices to the residents before going for demolition in the village. The officials have submitted the series of notices served to the villagers from way back February this year. The advocate for the petitioners accepted that his clients have received the notices from the officials.

Angered at this, the court imposed a penalty of Rs 1 lakh each on the 14 petitioners of the village.

It may be recalled that the residents and Jana Sena chief Pawan Kalyan made hue and cry over the demolitions in the village for road widening. They alleged that the government was intentionally doing so as the villagers have given their lands for the Jana Sena to hold its foundation day in March this year.

Pawan Kalyan visited the village and threatened to pull down this government for razing the compound walls of the houses in the village for road widening. The opposition TDP too had accused the State government of indulging in witch hunt politics and criticised the government for taking up road widening work in the village.

During his visit to the village, Pawan Kalyan had announced a compensation of Rs 1 lakh to each of the residents. The high court too had imposed the penalty of Rs 1 lakh on each of these residents for misleading the court.

Telugu360 is always open for the best and bright journalists. If you are interested in full-time or freelance, email us at Krishna@telugu360.com.

AP high court asks govt to hold grama sabhas in Amaravati

0

The Andhra Pradesh high court had on Friday asked the state government to hold grama sabhas in the 17 villages of Amaravati on house sites for outsiders.

The state government had amended the AP Capital Region Development Authority (APCRDA) Act 2014, giving a porting of the capital lands for the housing of the poor from other villages.

However, the farmers of the 29 villages, who have given their lands for the APCRDA have challenged this decision and filed a petition in the court.

On Friday, after hearing both sides, the court directed the APCRDA to hold grama sabhas in the villages, take their views in the next two days.

The court asked the APCRDA to submit the minutes of the grama sabhas to the court for further proceedings.

The farmers of these villages have been opposing allocation of lands in these villages for outsiders, without developing a capital city here. The farmers are also opposing the three capitals issue and have been fighting on the issue for the past two years.

Now, when the government proposed to give house sites to the poor from other villages, the locals have opposed it, stating that it would lead to social imbalance. The state government had amended the APCRDA rules and accordingly allocated the house sites for the poor.

This time too, those who have opposed the move in the past have filed petitions in the high court challenging the decision.

Accordingly, the court had directed the State government, particularly the APCRDA to hold grama sabhas in all the villages, take their views and submit the same to the court.

Telugu360 is always open for the best and bright journalists. If you are interested in full-time or freelance, email us at Krishna@telugu360.com.

AP High Court permits CID to question TDP leader Ayyannapathrudu

0

The Andhra Pradesh High Court on Wednesday permitted the CBCID to interrogate former minister and TDP senior leader Chintakayala Ayyannapathrudu in a land encroachment and forgery case.

The CID police have filed criminal charges against Ayyannapathrudu in connection with the encroachment of 0.16 cents of irrigation lands by the side of his house in Narsipatnam town of Visakhapatnam district. He had built the compound wall for his house in the encroached lands.

The CID also accused the former minister of forging the irrigation department executive engineer’s signature on the documents.

Ayyannapathurdu challenged this case in the high court, which heard the petitions on Wednesday. The advocate for the CBCID told the court that the irrigation department executive engineer had complained to the state government and his signature was forged by the senior TDP leader.

Based on this complaint, the CID booked cases against Ayyannapathrudu and his two sons. However, they were given bail by the Narsipatnam court when they were arrested last week.

The court directed the CID to issue notice under section 41A of the Criminal Procedure Code and interrogate him and his sons. However, the court dismissed the charges under section 467 and asked the TDP leader and his sons to cooperate with the CID police officials for interrogation.

With this order, the CID officials heaved a sigh of relief and are now getting ready to question the former TDP minister and his sons in the land grabbing and documents forgery cases.

Telugu360 is always open for the best and bright journalists. If you are interested in full-time or freelance, email us at Krishna@telugu360.com.

AP High Court dismisses petitions on Amaravati padayatra

0

The AP high court on Tuesday dismissed the petition filed by DGP K V Rajendranath Reddy to cancel the Amaravati farmers padayatra. The court also dismissed the petition filed by the Amaravati Farmers Joint Action Committee to give relaxation to the HC’s earlier order.

The court said that it would not make any alterations to the earlier orders issued by the bench while giving permission for the padayatra. The court said it would not allow others to join the padayatra. It wanted the 600 farmers to participate in the yatra and show the identification cards whenever asked by the police.

The court also observed that those who are supporting the yatra could do so by standing on both sides of the roads. The court further observed that there are several other forms to express solidarity to the Amaravati yatra.

The court had strictly warned the farmers against using more than four vehicles in the padayatra to carry infrastructure to those who are walking. The court said it would not allow more vehicles in the padayatra as requested by the joint action committee.

The court also dismissed the petition filed by the DGP who complained to the court that the participants were throwing open challenges to the supporters of the three capitals. They were also making provocative statements against the government, the DGP complained in his petition.

The court had told the DGP to come back to the court whenever the participants were found violating the guidelines of the high court.

Telugu360 is always open for the best and bright journalists. If you are interested in full-time or freelance, email us at Krishna@telugu360.com.

AP High Court reserves judgment on Amaravati padayatra

0

The Andhra Pradesh high court on Friday reserved its judgment on the Amaravati padayatra to Arasavilli in Srikakulam. The padayatra was stopped in Ramachandrapuram of Dr B R Ambedkar Konaseema district last week, as the police insisted upon those who have identification cards only to participate in the padayatra.

The farmers have filed a petition in the high court seeking relaxation from the rules, while the State government filed a petition seeking cancellation of permission for the padayatra.

The court heard the case on both sides on Thursday and Friday.

The advocates for the Amaravati activists alleged that the police were harassing them in the name of identification cards and were not allowing the supporters to join the padayatra. The Amaravati activists also alleged that the ruling YSR Congress activists and leaders were also causing troubles for them by organising counter rallies in the state.

On the other hand, the government argued for cancellation of the padayatra. The Advocate General told the court that the activists of the TDP and Jana Sena, in the name of Amaravati farmers, were making allegations against the ruling party and the government. The advocate general also told the court that the activists were challenging the ruling party leaders and making political statements.

Though the court had told the Amaravati Joint Action Committee leaders not to make political statements during the padayatra, the advocate general informed the court that everyday they were making only political statements and asking people to vote against the YSR Congress.

The advocate general also informed the court that the people of the state were also asking for decentralisation of capital and Uttarandhra people were fighting for declaration of Visakhapatnam as the executive capital.

This would create a law-and-order problem if the Amaravati activists entered Visakhapatnam with Amaravati as the only capital of the state, while the people of Visakhapatnam were fighting for executive capital.

The court, after hearing the arguments from both sides on Friday, reserved the judgment.

Telugu360 is always open for the best and bright journalists. If you are interested in full-time or freelance, email us at Krishna@telugu360.com.

AP high court to hear petitions on Amaravati yatra

1

The Andhra Pradesh high court had posted the petitions on Amaravati padayatra to October 28. As the petitions came up for hearing on Thursday, the court asked both the Amaravati Joint Action Committee and the state government to file fresh petitions by Friday.

The farmers alleged that the police were creating trouble for them in the name of checking identification cards. The advocates for the Amaravati activists told the court that the police were disturbing the activists even at the lunch and night camps.

The advocates told the court that it was not possible for all the 600 activists to continuously follow in the padayatra. It was also not possible to drop the supporters from the yatra in every village. The advocates told the court that those supporting the Amaravati issue were joining the padayatra in their respective areas.

The government filed a petition requesting the court to cancel the permission given to them earlier for the padayatra as the participants have violated the conditions. The government also told the court that the participants of the yatra were throwing challenges to the politicians and the supporters of the decentralisation.

The government also expressed fears that the yatra would create law and order problems in the state once the participants reach Visakhapatnam, which is proposed as the executive capital of the state. The residents of Uttrandhra region have already formed a joint action committee seeking Visakhapatnam to be declared as the executive capital of the state.

The advocates for the Amaravati JAC told the court that 600 people participating in the padayatra continuously is not possible and requested the court to give relaxation. They have also argued that the supporters of the Amaravati be allowed in every village and town along the route.

The court, on hearing both sides, directed both the parties to file clear affidavits by Friday.

Telugu360 is always open for the best and bright journalists. If you are interested in full-time or freelance, email us at Krishna@telugu360.com.

AP high court notice to govt on Amaravati farmers yatra

1

Andhra Pradesh High Court on Thursday asked the state government to file its response on the Amaravati farmers’ padayatra. The court took up hearing on the farmers’ petition which alleged that the ruling YSR Congress leaders and the state government were creating problems for them to proceed further in the yatra.

The court asked the state government what problems that it found with the padayatra of the farmers.

The government told the court that though the court permitted only 600 farmers to participate in the padayatra, there were more people added to the yatra. The advocate for the farmers told the court that people in the neighbouring villages were joining them extending support to them. Their supporters were joining the yatra in every village, the advocate said.

The court asked the state government to give its reply to the petition and posted the case for hearing on Friday. The court also wanted the farmers to file a clear reply to the court on the padayatra and the number of people participating in the padayatra.

The court wanted the state government to ensure that the padayatra is conducted peacefully. The court said that it would not accept any violations of the orders issued by the court earlier.

The padayatra is facing opposition from the supporters of the three capitals. The supporters were holding black flags and releasing black balloons to the Amaravati farmers and in support of three capitals.

The ruling YSR Congress had also sponsored a joint action committee to take forward the three capitals issue. The JAC had already held a massive rally in Visakhapatnam in support of three capitals, particularly the declaration of Visakhapatnam as the executive capitals.

Telugu360 is always open for the best and bright journalists. If you are interested in full-time or freelance, email us at Krishna@telugu360.com.

Andhra HC dismisses legislator’s bail plea in murder case

0

Andhra Pradesh High Court on Wednesday dismissed the bail petition of Member of Legislative Council (MLC) Anantha Uday Bhaskar alias Ananta Babu in the murder case of his former car driver.

The legislator, who was suspended by the ruling YSR Congress Party (YSRCP) after his arrest in May, sought bail on the grounds that the police failed to file the chargesheet even after 90 days after his arrest.

The prosecution, however, argued that the police filed the chargesheet within the stipulated time but the same was sent back by the court on technical grounds. After hearing both sides, a division bench dismissed the bail petition.

A single judge of the High Court had last month refused default bail to the MLC. The accused had approached the high court after a lower court had rejected his bail petitions thrice.

He is currently lodged in Rajamahendravaram Jail. A SC,ST special court had recently extended his judicial custody.

In August, he was granted bail for three days to enable him to perform last rites of his mother.

Anantha Babu, as the MLC is popularly known, was arrested in May for the murder of his former driver V. Subrahmanyam. He had pushed the deceased during an argument resulting in his fall and death on the night of May 19.

The MLC also told police that he inflicted injuries on Subrahmanyam’s body to present it as a death in a road accident. However, the driver’s family refused to believe his version and lodged a complaint with the police.

After Anantha Babu’s arrest, the YSRCP had suspended him from the party.

Telugu360 is always open for the best and bright journalists. If you are interested in full-time or freelance, email us at Krishna@telugu360.com.

HC declines bail for YSR Congress MLC

1

The Andhra Pradesh high court on Monday refused to give bail to ruling YSR Congress MLC, Anantha Babu, in a murder case. The MLC’s men have handed over the dead body of a Dalit youth, Subrahmanyam, to his parents two months ago. Subrahmanyam worked as Anantha Babu’s driver till recently.

The police have arrested Anantha Babu in the case and was sent to the Rajamahendravaram Central jail. He was recently on bail as his mother expired. The MLC filed a petition in the high court seeking bail, which was rejected on Monday.

The high court extended Anantha Babu’s remand till October 14. The counsel of the petitioner argued that Anantha Babu is eligible for bail as the police have not filed chargesheet in the court within 90 days of registering the case.

Anantha Babu, a close associate of YSR Congress president and chief minister Y S Jagan Mohan Reddy is accused in the murder of his driver. The police found that Anantha Babu’s men had picked up the driver a day before he was found dead.

They have handed over the body to driver Subrahmanyam’s parents in Kakinada. The parents alerted the police, who registered a case. It was found that the driver was picked up from his house by the supporters of Anantha Babu on his instructions.

Subrahmanyam was beaten badly before he was killed, the police found during the initial investigation. The Dalit activists have made hue and cry about the death of Subrahmanyam and asked the state government to take action against the MLC.

Telugu360 is always open for the best and bright journalists. If you are interested in full-time or freelance, email us at Krishna@telugu360.com.

AP high court gives conditional permission to Amaravati farmers

1

The Andhra Pradesh high court had given conditional permission to the Amaravati farmers’ proposed padayatra from September 12. The high court issued the permission though the AP police have denied.

The high court had asked the joint action committee of the farmers to give the identification cards and the phone numbers of the representatives to be participating in the padayatra. The court also directed the farmers to strictly follow the directions issued by the police from time to time.

The high court also asked the farmers to apply for permission for the public meeting at the end of the padayatra. The court had directed the farmers, represented by Gadde Tirupathi Rao, to give details of the speakers at the public meeting, to the police for security and other purposes.

Earlier, DGP K V Rajendranath Reddy wrote a letter to the joint action committee denying permission for the padayatra to be held from Amaravati to Arasavalli in Srikakulam district. The padayatra is planned to mark the 1000 days of the agitation by the farmers against the three capitals proposed by the Jagan Mohan Reddy government.

The DGP said that the padayatra might lead to law and order problems in the state, particularly along the route as there are people who support the three capitals plan of the government. The DGP expressed fear that the padayatra might cause law and order problems when it reaches Visakhapatnam, which was proposed as the administrative capital of the state.

Meanwhile, all opposition parties in the state have extended support to the proposed padayatra of the Amaravati farmers. The BJP, TDP and the Jana Sena are likely to join the padayatra, while the Congress and the Left parties are likely to extend support to the farmers.

Telugu360 is always open for the best and bright journalists. If you are interested in full-time or freelance, email us at Krishna@telugu360.com.

HC keeps suspense over Kesineni vote in Kondapalli

0

The Andhra Pradesh high court continued the suspense over the validity of Vijayawada MP Kesineni Srinivas (Nani) in the Kondapalli Municipality.

The Kondapalli municipality election has become controversial with both the ruling YSR Congress and the Opposition TDP winning 14 wards each, leaving one ward for the Independent. The two parties have tried to win over the lone independent ward member. The TDP had finally won the heart of the independent, taking its strength to 15, one seat more than the YSR Congress.

With this, local MLA Vasantha Krishna Prasad of YSR Congress secured ex-officio membership and thus the YSR Congress strength too had gone up to 15. Alerted with this, local MP, Kesineni Srinivas opted his ex-officio membership to Kondapalli Municipality.

The YSR Congress raised objections to this stating that Kesineni had already given a letter to the Vijayawada Municipal Corporation for ex-officio membership and his letter for Kondapalli is not valid. The MP went to the high court and secured permission to cancel his membership in Vijayawada Municipal Corporation and get fresh membership in Kondapalli.

This had again given one vote extra to the TDP in the council. However, the YSR Congress challenged the transfer of Kesineni’s vote from Vijayawada Municipal Corporation to Kondapalli. The high court had directed the district officials to conduct the elections for the council chairman and vice-chairman, and not to announce it.

This drama happened in November 2021 and the court finally took up the case for hearing on Thursday. The court held both the YSR Congress and the TDP petitions valid and posted the case for next hearing after three weeks.

Telugu360 is always open for the best and bright journalists. If you are interested in full-time or freelance, email us at Krishna@telugu360.com.

Jagan likely to meet AP CJ on in September on HC shifting

0

Chief Minister Y S Jagan Mohan Reddy is likely to meet chief justice, Prashant Kumar Mishra, in September this year. If sources in the chief minister’s office are to be believed, the chief minister wants to have a fresh dialogue with the chief justice on shifting of the high court from Amaravati to Kurnool.

The Central government had made it clear during the current monsoon session of the Parliament that shifting of the high court from Amaravati to Kurnool has to be decided together by the chief minister and the chief justice.

Union Minister of Law and Justice, Kiren Rijiju, had categorically said in both the Houses of Parliament that the issue has to be decided in the state and a consensus report from the government and the high court has to be sent to the Central government for further action.

He said that the administrative work of the high court is the responsibility of the chief justice, while the expenditure is to be borne by the state government. Hence, he wanted the high court and the state government to decide together and send a clear proposal if the high court has to be shifted to Kurnool from Amaravati.

Though Jagan Mohan Reddy has considerable weightage with the BJP leadership at the Centre, he is worried about the adverse response from the Supreme Court, with Justice N V Ramana, at the helm of affairs. Justice Ramana, even after becoming the chief justice, did not mince words about his association with the TDP. He had revealed his association with the TDP recently at Ranchi in Jharkhand state, when he delivered a Justice Satya Brata Sinha memorial lecture on July 23.

Given these issues, chief minister Jagan Mohan Reddy is waiting for Justice Ramana to retire on August 26. Sources say that Jagan Mohan Reddy would make his next move on his three capitals plan only in September and not before that.

Telugu360 is always open for the best and bright journalists. If you are interested in full-time or freelance, email us at Krishna@telugu360.com.

TRENDING

Latest

css.php
[X] Close
[X] Close